Kimmer Coppejans vs Alex Molcan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W WH2H: Coppejans 1 - 2 Molcan
They have played 6 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Molcan winning 4. The last match between Coppejans and Molcan was at the Bratislava 1 Challenger, 15-06-2023, Second, Clay with Alex Molcan getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
| Alex Molcan | 2 |
Bratislava 1 Challenger(15-06-2023)
6
4
7
5
| Coppejans | Stats | Molcan |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (23-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 78% (14-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 280 | Ranking | 642 |
| 97 | Highest Rank | 38 |
| 31 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 16 | Titles | 8 |
| 59% (468-330) | Career Total W/L | 60% (281-188) |
| $294,830 | Career Prize Money | $1,478,390 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Alex Molcan
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Alex Molcan
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 28 | Games Won | 32 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:30:8 | Average Match Time | 1:30:8 |
| 64% (129/201) | 1st Serve % | 63% (111/177) |
| 70% (90/129) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (76/111) |
| 44% (32/72) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (39/66) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 35% (62/177) | Return Points Win % | 39% (79/201) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dominic Stricker
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Norbert Gombos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Tiago Pereira
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
67 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Izan Corretja
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alex Molcan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Stijn Slump
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
87%
(
66 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Gabriele Maria Noce
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
79%
(
45 of
57)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Attila Boros
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
81%
(
65 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Michiel De Krom
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (468/330) | Win/Loss | 60% (281/188) |
| 56% (1064/839) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (637/475) |
| 53% (9378/8436) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5511/4902) |
| 62% (140/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (69/46) |
| 61% (308/198) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (175/103) |
| 32% (17/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (30/33) |
| 25% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2143 | Aces Total | 1210 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1801 | Total Double Faults | 1336 |
| 1:28:45 | Average Match Time | 1:34:59 |
| 493.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 438.86 |
| 65% (31296/48499) | 1st Serve % | 63% (19637/31387) |
| 67% (21007/31296) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (13102/19637) |
| 49% (8361/17203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5962/11750) |
| 44% (2355/5411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1528/3418) |
| 42% (20811/49653) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13355/31912) |
| 52% (34/31) | Slam W/L | 56% (15/12) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 47% (8/9) |
| 33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 71% (5/2) |
| 28% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (41/31) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (293/220) | Challenger W/L | 56% (114/91) |
| 75% (127/43) | Futures W/L | 70% (98/43) |
| 59% (462/785) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (269/443) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 55% (117/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (88/150) |
| 57% (169/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (86/151) |
| 84% (435/364) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (271/232) |
| 16% (435/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (271/38) |
| 28% (363/103) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (198/49) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
